JOURNAL ARTICLE

    Why Don’t We Follow the Plumbing Code?

    Why Don’t We Follow the Plumbing Code?

    Backflow Prevention Installation Mistakes That Still Persist in 2026
    After traveling across the United States conducting cross-connection control training, performing surveys, and answering questions about problematic backflow prevention installations, one issue remains surprisingly common: failure to follow the adopted plumbing code.

    Despite clear requirements in the model plumbing codes, backflow preventers are still routinely installed incorrectly. The question remains just as relevant in 2026 as it was years ago: Why don’t we simply follow the plumbing code?

    Prohibited Locations for Backflow Preventers
    The plumbing code is unambiguous when it comes to installation locations. The Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) clearly prohibits installing certain backflow prevention devices in pits, vaults, or underground locations. 

    UPC Section 603.4.9 – Prohibited Locations states:
    Backflow prevention devices with atmospheric vents or ports shall not be installed in pits, underground, or submerged locations. Backflow preventers shall not be located in an area containing fumes that are toxic, poisonous, or corrosive.

    This prohibition applies to Reduced Pressure Principle Assemblies (RP), Pressure Vacuum Breakers (PVB), Spill-Resistant Vacuum Breakers (SVB), Atmospheric Vacuum Breakers (AVB), and other similar devices. The intent is straightforward: these assemblies and devices must discharge to atmosphere and cannot function safely if submerged or confined.

    Yet RP assemblies continue to be installed in pits and vaults in many jurisdictions. 

    The Problem with ‘Berm’ and Pit Installations
    Some jurisdictions allow pit or vault installations using “berm” designs with a drain-to-daylight feature sized to match the relief valve discharge. While often approved locally, these installations introduce significant risks: 

    • Drains can become blocked 
    • Cold air can enter through daylight drains 
    • Animals and insects can access the vault 
    • Assemblies can become submerged 
    • Freeze damage can occur in cold climates 

    These issues are well known, and the code already provides approved solutions. 

    Code-Compliant Freeze Protection Exists
    Cold climates are not an excuse for improper installations. The UPC directly addresses freeze protection. 

    UPC Section 603.4.7 – Freeze Protection states:
    In cold climate areas, backflow assemblies and devices shall be protected from freezing with an outdoor enclosure that complies with ASSE 1060 or by a method acceptable to the Authority Having Jurisdiction.

    backlflow assembly enclosure

    ASSE 1060–compliant enclosures are designed to protect backflow assemblies in temperatures down to –30°F. These enclosures also eliminate confined-space hazards, improve accessibility, and reduce long-term maintenance costs.

    Installing devices in pits not only violates code, it increases liability and puts technicians at risk. The safer, code-compliant ASSE 1060 enclosure solution already exists. 

    Accessibility for Testing and Repair Is Not Optional
    Backflow preventers are mechanical devices that must be tested, maintained, and eventually repaired or replaced. Accessibility is not a suggestion; it’s a requirement. 

    UPC Section 603.4.3 – Access and Clearance requires: 

    • Compliance with manufacturer’s instructions 
    • A minimum of 12 inches clearance from grade or floor 
    • Platforms for assemblies installed more than 5 feet above grade 

    This is an issue where the model codes differ regarding clearance. All three model codes require the 12-inch minimum from floor or grade, but the International Plumbing Code does not require platforms for assemblies installed more than 5 feet above floor or grade. Installing a backflow preventer near a ceiling or in a cramped location may make installation easier, but it makes future testing and repairs difficult or impossible. These installations violate the code and reflect poor workmanship.

    assembly access clearance

    A professional installation considers not only today’s install, but tomorrow’s testing.

    Drainage Requirements Are Often Overlooked
    Many backflow prevention assemblies — especially large RP assemblies — require properly sized drains.

    UPC Section 603.4.8 – Drain Lines states:
    Drain lines serving backflow devices or assemblies shall be sized in accordance with the discharge rates of the manufacturer’s flow charts.

    Large relief valve discharge volumes can easily exceed a building’s drainage capacity. This must be evaluated during design and installation, not discovered after a failure. Pressure vacuum breakers and atmospheric vacuum breakers may also require floor drains or discharge piping. Incorrect drainage issues should be reported by certified testers when submitting test reports to building owners and the authority having jurisdiction.  

    assembly drain lines

    Ignoring drainage requirements leads to flooding, property damage, and non-compliant installations. 

    Persistent Cross-Connection Protection Errors
    The UPC clearly defines installation standards for: 

    • Air gaps 
    • Vacuum breaker heights 
    • Flushometer valve protection 
    • Access and clearance 
    • Proper device and assembly selection 

    Yet incorrect installations continue, especially with flushometer valves on water closets and urinals. 

    UPC Section 603.5.1 – Atmospheric Vacuum Breakers requires: 

    • Installation on the discharge side of the flushometer 
    • Critical level at least 6 inches above the overflow rim of a water closet or the highest part of a urinal (or per listing) 

    This requirement is frequently ignored, even though it is clearly spelled out in the code. The continued presence of these errors raises an uncomfortable question: Why are installers and inspectors allowing non-compliant work to pass?

    urinal flushometer   urinal flushometer    urinal flushometer

    Education and Enforcement Are the Real Solutions
    The plumbing codes already provide the answers. What’s missing is consistent education and enforcement. 

    We need: 

    • Qualified, licensed installers who understand the code 
    • Inspectors who understand and enforce the adopted standards 
    • Ongoing education for contractors, designers, and inspectors 
    • Willingness to address and correct improper work 

    Codes exist to protect public health, safety, and property. Accepting substandard installations undermines the entire system.

    There are a right way and a wrong way to install backflow prevention. As an industry, we must insist on doing it right, every time. 

    Should Backflow Testing and Certification Be Part of Your Plumbing Business in 2026?

    20 February 2026

    Backflow prevention testing remains one of the most critical — and often overlooked — services in the plumbing, mechanical, fire protection and water industries. As regulations tighten and public awareness of water safety continues to grow, backflow testing and certification are no longer optional add-ons. In 2026, they are essential services for any contractor serious about protecting customers, complying with plumbing codes, and growing a sustainable business.

    Are Cross-Connection Control Programs Truly Protecting Public Health in 2026?

    20 February 2026

    The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) was enacted in 1974 to protect public health by regulating the nation’s public drinking water systems. Under the SDWA, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in partnership with state primacy agencies, establishes and enforces drinking water quality standards to ensure safe water is delivered to the public. 

    Backflow Protection in Fire Protection Systems: What the Codes Require in 2026 

    20 February 2026

    A common question in the plumbing, fire protection, and water utility industries is whether backflow prevention assemblies are necessary on fire sprinkler systems. Related questions quickly follow:  Are backflow preventers required on residential fire protection systems?  Do combined domestic and fire systems need protection?  Is backflow protection worth the pressure and volume loss?  Have fire protection systems actually caused documented backflow incidents? 

    Scroll to top